Effect of Reciprocal-Peer-Tutoring on Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Physics Students
Mathew N. Agbo1*, Charles U. Eze1
- 1Department of Science Education, Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT), Enugu, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: Mathew N. Agbo
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of Reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) strategy on senior secondary school students' achievement in Physics in Enugu Education Zone, Enugu State. The influence of gender on the achievement of students was explored. The study adopted a pretest, posttest, non -equivalent control group quasi -experimental research design. The sample for the study comprised of 167 Senior Secondary One Physics stude nts selected using the purposive sampling from two co -educational schools located within the education zone. Data were collected using Physics Achievement Test constructed by the researchers and validated by experts in measurement and evaluation to ascerta in the validity of the instrument. The reliability of the test was ascertained using the Kuder - Richardson (K -R) 20 formula and a reliability coefficient of 0.76 was obtained. Data collected were analyzed using mean and standard deviation and analysis of covariance at 0.05 probability level. Result of the study indicated that students taught Physics using Reciprocal peer tutoring strategy performed better than their counterparts taught Physics using the lecture method. Based on these findings, it was recommended that RPT strategy should be adopted by Physics teachers at secondary school level in order to enhance students' academic achievement.
Keywords
Full text available as PDF
The complete article, including figures, tables and references, is available for free download.
Download PDFPublication history
- Published
- 1 July 2023
Copyright & licence. © 2023 the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

